[Beowulf] HPC and SAN
mwill at penguincomputing.com
Wed Dec 29 09:05:56 PST 2004
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 01:11 am, Leif Nixon wrote:
> Guy Coates <gmpc at sanger.ac.uk> writes:
> > The only time SAN attached storage helps is in the case of storage node
> > failures, as you have redundant paths between storage nodes and disks.
> And the added complexity of a fail-over mechanism might well lower
> your total MTBF.
Speaking from experience?
The expectation when building a fail-over system is that the systems mtb-total-f
is higher even though the mtb-partial-f is shorter (more parts that can fail).
Of course the probability, that the failover logic / software is the new single-point-of-failure,
is not zero either.
Michael Will, Linux Sales Engineer
NEWS: We have moved to a larger iceberg :-)
NEWS: 300 California St., San Francisco, CA.
Tel: 415-954-2822 Toll Free: 888-PENGUIN
More information about the Beowulf