[Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduWed Dec 22 19:55:36 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 steve_heaton at ozemail.com.au wrote: > That RGB fellow's BenchMaster suite would seem to give the CPU/RAM > side of things a good workout. I'll give that a burl. Until recently > LMBench seemed the go but BenchMaster seems to be a step up (more > flexible)? (Someone *other* than RGB's opinion would be nice =P ) Maybe > the Netpipe suit for all sorts of juicy network numbers? Fine, be that way;-) Actually, lmbench is without a doubt a superior benchmark from a technical point of view. It's just a PITA to download, build, and run, as you have to go through bitkeeper and use a networked SCCS auto-extraction tool. Mine you can just grab and go -- if you're running one of the distros I've built for you can probably even install the rpm and just run it, if you aren't going to play the compiler tuning optimization game. lmbench, OTOH, gives you LOTS of very precise measurements on EVERYTHING, and they've been tuning their timing harness MUCH longer than I have (to be fair to Larry and Carl). rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark reality check please
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
