[Beowulf] Raid disk read performance issue in Linux 2.6, anyone seen this?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Craig Tierney ctierney at HPTI.comSat Dec 4 09:42:41 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [Beowulf] serious NFS problem on Mandrake 10.0]]
- Next message: [Beowulf] Raid disk read performance issue in Linux 2.6, anyone seen this?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have noticed some significant differences in disk performance
when moving some of my cluster I/O servers from linux-2.4 to
linux-2.6. For several different raid systems with several
linux-2.6 kernel and distributions, the read performance is
quite poor.
Distros: SuSE 9.1 Professional AMD64, Redhat 4.0 beta, IA64
Kernels: Standard distro kernels, also tried stock 2.6.9 on
Redhat 4/IA64.
For the 2.4 kernels, I needed to tweak /proc/sys/vm/max_readahead
to improve performance. In 2.6, the command is blockdev --setra.
Using blockdev helps some, but not much. Adjusting blockdev
gets performance for one raid system from 10 MB/s to 30 MB/s. Under
2.4 the read performance is 90 MB/s.
I looked at a few of the anticipatory scheduler options and also
tried using the deadline scheduler. Nothing helped.
This problem appears on different storage. I have tried DDN (raid 3),
Nexsan (raid 5), and Infotrend (raid 3 and 5).
For those using PVFS1/2, Lustre, or building fast NFS servers
with Linux 2.6, have you seen this?
Thanks,
Craig
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [Beowulf] serious NFS problem on Mandrake 10.0]]
- Next message: [Beowulf] Raid disk read performance issue in Linux 2.6, anyone seen this?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
