Report on SMP issues
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Douglas Eadline deadline at plogic.comMon Mar 24 13:14:34 PST 2003
- Previous message: Report on SMP issues
- Next message: serial console system comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Joachim Worringen wrote: > Douglas Eadline: > > All > > > > I have just posted some results and discussion concerning SMP nodes > > and clusters. > > > > You can read and comment on the report at: > > http://www.cluster-rant.com/article.pl?sid=03/03/24/1731246 > > It's nice to have such a comparison - but it does not make much sense to > *only* compare speedups - you should add the wall clock times for the test > runs, too. Hmm, the reason I used speed-up's was to normalize the results for all the programs. I'll re-run the tests and collect the wall clock times at some point. Although I am not sure how it changes the observations or "general" conclusions. I have always been curious about running two copies of the same program on a dual node and the effects it has on scalability. (i.e. running the NAS suite on 4 dual nodes with n=4 and running the NAS suite on 4 dual nodes with n=8). In general the scalability is poor for the n=8 case. Doug > > Joachim > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Paralogic, Inc. | PEAK | Voice:+610.814.2800 130 Webster Street | PARALLEL | Fax:+610.814.5844 Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA | PERFORMANCE | http://www.plogic.com -------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Report on SMP issues
- Next message: serial console system comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
