[Fwd: Re: 32-port gigabit switch]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jeffrey B. Layton laytonjb at bellsouth.netThu Mar 6 13:46:40 PST 2003
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: 32-port gigabit switch]
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: 32-port gigabit switch]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Vehrs wrote: >Rogerio, > >If you do the math, you will find that Myrinet quickly becomes less >expensive than Gigabit as it scales to large node counts. While Gigabit >PCI cards are inexpensive, Gigabit switches are not. In our experience, >at ~64 nodes and above, Myrinet will be cheaper than Gigabit. > In my experience the sweet-spot is about 128-256 nodes. Hopefully IB will change everything ;) > >Additionally the latency on Gigabit is simply to high for large >clusters. Remember on clusters latency is more important than >throughput. > Bzzt. Wrong. Dead Wrong. "It depends" is the correct answer. (Don't pass GO, don't collect $200). Jeff
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: 32-port gigabit switch]
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: 32-port gigabit switch]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
