question about Intel P4 versus Alpha's
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Henderson, TL Todd Todd_Henderson at isl-3com.comWed Jan 8 07:49:26 PST 2003
- Previous message: Looking for remote file view utility
- Next message: question about Intel P4 versus Alpha's
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I've just put a new cluster in place and have been monitoring some things via top and found something peculiar and was wondering what others thought. I have an app, that scaled out to the 30ish XP1000's we had very nicely, basically linearly. If you looked at top, it was almost always in the 95-100%cpu utilization range. However, now we have a cluster of P4's and when I look at top, it is more like 70-80% cpu usage. This is using the same number of cpu's, the same switch, same code, and same problem for the code. The jobs are still completing in about 30-40% less time, so we are getting a speed up. My guesstimate was that this was an indication of the memory bandwidth and speed to memory. I know the XP1000's have a nice memory subsystem. Was/is it that much better than the 533/2.4 ghz P4's? Any thoughts/comments/speculation? Just curious. Thanks, Todd
- Previous message: Looking for remote file view utility
- Next message: question about Intel P4 versus Alpha's
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
