Beowulf Questions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.orgSat Jan 4 11:20:50 PST 2003
- Previous message: Beowulf Questions
- Next message: Beowulf Questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mark Hahn wrote: > there simply is no coming breakthrough that will make all networking > fast, low-latency, cheap, ubiquitous and low-power. and grid > (in the grand sense) really does require *all* those properties. I'm not quite sure. The only hard limit on latency is relativistic (in vacuum, 1 ns = 0.3 m; 10 ns = 3 m, 100 ns = 30 m; 1 us = 3 km; 10 us = 30 km, 100 us = 300 km). Right now, commercial networks based on GBit fiber Ethernet backbones exist, delivering sub-ms latency to end consumers. 10 GBit fiber Ethernet will be starting to displace GBit Ethernet in that niche. At 10 GBps fiber acts as a FIFO, containing ~50 bit/m (50 kBit/km) of fiber allowing (admittedly, there is no impetus for developing cut-through WAN transmission technology) almost purely photonically switched networks where routing latency is negligible in regards to relativistic latency. That assumes that the fiber(s) is unloaded, of course, as store-and forward will suddenly result in lousy latency. This can't happen on a true crossbar-switched LAN. This clearly can't compete with dedicated ultralocal interconnects like Myrinet & Co, but it indicates GBit based clusters need not to be located physically close.
- Previous message: Beowulf Questions
- Next message: Beowulf Questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
