Back-UPS garbage? (was: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Drew Raines drew-list-beowulf at poured.netTue Feb 11 08:17:28 PST 2003
- Previous message: Back-UPS garbage? (was: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?)
- Next message: Back-UPS garbage? (was: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Lux <James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.gov> writes: > All a matter of carefully reading the specs.. [...] > The smallish units work quite nicely to, for instance, allow a > DSL modem/firewall/hub to ride through a short outage. Great; the only thing the user has to regularly reset anyway, and with no ill-effect, mind you, is protected. :-) Bravo on your marketing, APC. > "The APC Back-UPS VS provides a complete solution for home > networking [blah blah blah] Do they really think we're that stupid? Who is APC's primary customer base? The clueful, advanced user or system administrator. All Jane Schmo cares about is seeing MSN come up when she clicks on the blue ``e'' on her desktop, and if the power goes out, and after her computer hopefully reboots, having her ``Internet'' come back up. She doesn't care about fsck and defragmentation and lost job data on her nodes, etc. -Drew
- Previous message: Back-UPS garbage? (was: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?)
- Next message: Back-UPS garbage? (was: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
