Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nicholas Henke henken at seas.upenn.eduMon Feb 10 13:33:47 PST 2003
- Previous message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Next message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:24:07 -0800 (PST) Nicholas Webb <nickw at uidaho.edu> wrote: > At the University of Idaho we are preparing to order a new beowulf > cluster and a vendor seemed to be shocked that we wanted UPSs attached > to ALL of the nodes. He stated that most people only use UPSs on the > Master Node, unless the cluster was used for some kind of mission > critical purpose. So the question, do you use UPSs on your slave > nodes? Arguments for not using UPSs on slave nodes (and vice versa)? > > Thanks! We do not have any of our nodes on UPS. It is usually way too expensive, and there are easier ways to condition the power ( APC masterswitches, etc. ). Our users expect nodes to die every once in a while, and in the face of a power outage, there is no way you could keep computing at full power for more than a few seconds unless the UPS have their own room :). An yes, that is a slightly BOFH way of dealing with it, but it makes our lives easier as admins. That said -- if you have a building that experiences more than it's fair share of power blinks, it would be worth it, as it might let you run some longer length jobs that otherwise would be impossible. Nic -- Nicholas Henke Linux Cluster Systems Programmer Liniac Project - Univ. of Pennsylvania
- Previous message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Next message: Quick survey -- UPSs on slave nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
