Two heads are better than one! :)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bob Drzyzgula bob at drzyzgula.orgThu Oct 31 17:56:06 PST 2002
- Previous message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Next message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This question has recently come up at my office as well. After a few years of running small "research/development" clusters, one of our groups of users is contemplating using the technology for a "production", or business-critical application. For such systems, we usually provide some level of redundancy in the design. While clearly the cluster of compute nodes provides excellent redundancy -- node failures would most likely only marginally reduce the overall throughput of the cluster -- the question of how to provide for redundancy at the controller node was less obvious to people. Thus, the question becomes whether any of the various cluster APIs and services such as PVM, MPI, BPROC, PBS, etc. are dependant on the selection of a single, exclusive master. Clearly if multiple simultaneously operating masters are tolerated in the API, you can just have multiple head nodes which are available all the time. If an API requires a single master, one might have to effect some sort of manual switch-over in the event of a head node failure; this would then raise the question of the complexity of such a switch-over, e.g. would compute node reconfiguration be required or would it simply be a matter of starting up the controller service on a new system. Personally, I am much more familiar with the hardware aspects of all this than I am with the programming and administrative aspects, so I would be interested in people's opinions as to the difficulties that might arise in attempting to provide this sort of redundancy for any traditional cluster APIs. FWIW, the application of interest is currently using MPI but I have a feeling that this is just the tip of the iceberg as far as production applications moving in this direction, so I don't feel that I can limit the question in this way... Thanks, --Bob Drzyzgula On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:59:41PM -0500, Aaron Lott wrote: > > What kind of things to you want the 2 head nodes to do? > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 robnash at rogers.com wrote: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Does anyone know if it's possible to have two active > > head nodes in a Beowulf style cluster? I would like > > to have two physical access points into one cluster. > > Any help regarding this would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Rob.
- Previous message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Next message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
