Anyone have information on latest LSU beowulf?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Daniel Kidger Daniel.Kidger at quadrics.comTue Oct 8 05:35:27 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Redhat 8.0 diskless cluster
- Next message: Anyone have information on latest LSU beowulf?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Craig Tierney wrote: > http://www.phys.lsu.edu/faculty/tohline/capital/beowulf.html > > Their HPL result is 2.2 Tflops! Very impressive. > > (lines deleted) > What HPL settings did they use to achieve their result? I think that many people would be interested in their settings for xhpl, in particular what percentage peak did they manage for a single CPU run ? A 1.8GHz P4 has a theoretical peak of 3.6GFlops/s, but so far I have only seen figures of around 60% of this for linpack. Compare this with 75%+ for Alpha nodes (and of course 95%+ for vector processors). So, in terms of single processor performance: Which compiler did they use ? (icc version 7 perhaps) And which compiler options ? Did they use mkl or Atlas for the BLAS ? What value of NB did they settle on ? (80 and 160 seem common choices) any other non-default values in HPL.dat ? Yours, Daniel. -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Dan Kidger, Quadrics Ltd. daniel.kidger at quadrics.com One Bridewell St., Bristol, BS1 2AA, UK 0117 915 5505 ----------------------- www.quadrics.com --------------------
- Previous message: Redhat 8.0 diskless cluster
- Next message: Anyone have information on latest LSU beowulf?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
