gig ether cards
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert Latham robl at mcs.anl.govTue Nov 26 09:24:55 PST 2002
- Previous message: gig ether cards
- Next message: gig ether cards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:36:14AM -0500, Mike Davis wrote: > The problem was made worse by the installation of pvfs. Even with the > most recent version, we could not get dependable performance. We then > broke channel bonding but seemed to be experiencing pvfs errors at this > point caused by a lack of bandwith. Hi mike let's talk about your pvfs problems on the pvfs-users mailing list (pvfs-users at beowulf-underground.org). The short story is that we have never seen a lack of bandwidth cause pvfs errors, but we can help you figure out what's causing the errors. > That brings me to the question above. I'm going to renetwork my 64p > cluster for GigEther. Any advice on cards would be greatly appreciated. the data's a bit old now, but might be a good starting point for you: http://www.cs.uni.edu/~gray/gig-over-copper/gig-over-copper.html ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
- Previous message: gig ether cards
- Next message: gig ether cards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
