Need comments about cluster file systems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.czThu Nov 14 14:30:18 PST 2002
- Previous message: Need comments about cluster file systems
- Next message: Need comments about cluster file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > using something like Coda or InterMezzo (for systems where > > local disks are quicker than network card). > > Ahhh, you are looking for a Named Subsystem that claims to be a Cluster > File System. The key to good performance is not exceeding the semantic > requirements of the application by too much, and the best systems are so > transparent to the end user that they don't Need A Capitalized Name. > > Our cluster system, for example, uses a specialized whole-file-caching > filesystem internally. ... I am looking for any working opensource solution for persistent file chaching. Please enlighten me if you know any. I looked hard, but I might have missed something. > > (For sure others will point you to PVFS, which IMHO makes sense only > > if network card is quicker than local disk.) > > It's frustrating to hear people talk about how wonderful InterMezzo and > Lustre _are_, and dismiss PVFS and GFS. Software that is not quite > finished is always better and faster than software that already > exists. It only loses speed and features when reality looms. > > Talk about vaporware and deployed systems in different categories unless > you clearly use the future tense. I quite like PVFS, but I think it does not solve the problem. AFAIK it can get speed of NIC. I want the speed of local harddisk, which is much bigger with my hardware. But again, I am ready for any enlightenment. I do not know any details about GFS but I will be happy to learn them if anybody tells me that it can give me what I want. I did not say Coda or InterMezzo are great solutions. They are just the only solution I found. Bad ones, yes. Coda is too big, InterMezzo is not finished. Another (very good for me) solution would be Caching NFS Client [GJB98]: http://www.vergenet.net/linux/redundant_content/talk/html/node4.html http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/gjb/doc/enhanced-linux-nfs-client/index.html which is unmaintained I think. So, alltogether, I know no working opensource solution for persistent file cache working (at least reading) at (nearly) the speed of local filesystem. I want to have it, thet's why post to this list. I would be more than happy to hear that GFS or PVFS or ScyldXYZ project unknown to me can do this. Please let me know. Regards Vaclav
- Previous message: Need comments about cluster file systems
- Next message: Need comments about cluster file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
