Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

disadvantages of a linux cluster

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.edu
Mon Nov 11 19:55:21 PST 2002


On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Guy Coates wrote:

> >Anyone exploring high FLOPS/watt clusters yet?
> 
> We currently have a 768 node cluster RLX cluster in production. We were
> low on power capacity and physical space in our machine room so it made
> sense to pay the premium for the high density. When we did our evaluation
> we ended up with a test metric of BLASTs/Watt/Pound.
> 
> 24 blades (800Mhz PIII, 2x40Gig drive, 3x100Mb ethernet per blade) fit
> into 3U and consume ~840 watts. Compaq/HP, IBM and Fujitsu also offer high
> density/low power blade solutions as well with various GigE/myrinet
> networking options should you require them.
> 
> What solution you end up with depends on how much extra you want to spend
> on hardware in order to save on space and power.

Just for the record, how much did this cluster cost?  Or at least, how
much does a 3U with 24 blades cost?

I'd also be very interested in seeing the actual numbers for the best
power/bogomips densities you could get with Intel and/or AMD.

Offhand it looks like you're getting maybe 2x the Watts/U one can get
with most Intel casings, and maybe 2x the bogomips/MHz as well (e.g.
dual 1.4 GHz PIII's in 1U is 2800 MHz/U or a bit less than half your
6400 MHz/U.  So you don't seem to be getting a lot more MHz/Watt,
although you can certainly pack more MHz and Watts per U (with the
accompanying problem in shedding heat from an even higher power density
than one has in current 2U Intel duals). 

If total power capacity and/or A/C is your true limiting feature (as
opposed to physical space), it isn't clear that you win, especially when
you have to contend with Amdahl's law (across more processors), pay a
lot more money for the hardware up front, have more to fail in a locally
much hotter environment, and more to manage.  Maybe, anyway -- I don't
really know how management of 24 800 MHz blades in 3U compares to
managing the 8 2400 MHz P4's in 8U that would replace them.

This isn't intended to be flames or critical, BTW -- I'm just trying to
play with the numbers without really having the numbers.  Feel free to
correct anything.

  rgb

-- 
Robert G. Brown	                       http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567  Fax: 919-660-2525     email:rgb at phy.duke.edu






More information about the Beowulf mailing list