Beowulf & VMWare
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Marquardt, Paul Paul.Marquardt at okdhs.orgMon Nov 4 15:19:46 PST 2002
- Previous message: P4_GLOBMEMSIZE problem
- Next message: Beowulf & VMWare
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The organization I work for has been toying with the idea of server > consolidation. To further add to the requirements, I am required to provide NT support for web applications running on IIS. > > One of the scenarios presented by the group was to build a Beowulf > cluster and use VMWare GSX Server to partition it. Paul, I hope you read the list -- my direct email to you @okdhs.org failed. Sorry about that, we have noticed that some versions of Send Mail have issues receiving emails from our organization. It is a problem in the filtering that is done by Send Mail. If you take our domain out of that filter, you will have no problems sending or receiving mail to our domain. > This solution seems to offer endless ideas of distributed processing > and the ability to run multiple operating systems on a large clustered > platform. We've done that to a limited extent. The VM license was the main limit, and we didn't have a customer requirement spend more time on it. You have done this (run VMWare over Beowulf?) or something different. I really want to be able to tie several large machines (4-8 processors) with Beowulf, and then install VMWare to allow me to use the distributed power of the machines to utilize more of the processing power of the servers. At this point I have a lot of machines that are underutilized. I would like to reclaim that processing power, but also allow myself to install more virtual machines than one server can handle and allow Beowulf to manage the processes created by VMWare. A more common thing to do is to run virtual cluster node in a VM-Ware virtual machine, which works very well. I have seen a lot of information on this type of implementation, however I have no need for this type of an implementation. I could see it being very useful for testing of distributed applications, or possibly in testing environments. The more virtual machines I can add to the cluster the better. I have a lot of hardware available to me, and would like to begin utilizing it to more of its potential. I would like to have the ability to virtualize more of my servers that do little or no work, but I need to make sure that they have good redundancy built into them. (Clustered VM's would be good for that). Is Mosix more suited for this type of an implementation than Beowulf?
- Previous message: P4_GLOBMEMSIZE problem
- Next message: Beowulf & VMWare
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
