DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards: bang for buck?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Josip Loncaric josip at icase.eduThu Mar 7 11:21:50 PST 2002
- Previous message: DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards: bang for buck?
- Next message: DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards - 1Us
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Robert G. Brown" wrote: > > Your Mileage May Vary Exactly. The cost of duals is about 15% lower per CPU, but some codes (e.g. CFD) perform about 25% worse on duals due to memory contention. If you do CFD, price/performance can favor singles by about 10%; if you do something less memory intensive, duals win by about 15%. Other factors (such as space efficiency, power/AC requirements, simplicity/reliability, personal preferences) are often more significant than these 10-15% differences in node price/performance. One exception: If you use a high end network (e.g. Myrinet, which can almost double the cost of a node) this clearly favors duals which need only half as many expensive network connections. Sincerely, Josip -- Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow mailto:josip at icase.edu ICASE, Mail Stop 132C PGP key at http://www.icase.edu./~josip/ NASA Langley Research Center mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA Tel. +1 757 864-2192 Fax +1 757 864-6134
- Previous message: DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards: bang for buck?
- Next message: DUAL CPU board vs 2 Single CPU boards - 1Us
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
