ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Richard Walsh rbw at ahpcrc.orgThu Jun 20 07:15:21 PDT 2002
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Steffen Persvold wrote: >On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Joe Griffin wrote: > >> Ivan, >> >> Is your test memory limited? >> >> Perhaps it is not the CPU speed but the cache size >> that is limiting you. The Xeon has a different >> cache size and Memory type. P4's use RDRAM (high latency/ >> high bandwidth). The AMD may use SDRAM (low latency/low bandwidth). >> > >Not all Xeons use RDRAM. The new ServerWorks Grand Champion chipsets and >the new Intel E7500 (Plumas) use DDR RAM (just like the Athlons). Moreover, I am pretty that RDRAM actually has lower average latency under load than SDRAM. rbw
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
