ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Steffen Persvold sp at scali.comThu Jun 20 04:54:16 PDT 2002
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Velocet wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 06:09:17PM -0700, Bill Broadley's all... > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 08:48:48PM -0400, Ivan Oleynik wrote: > > > Yes, > > > > > > Both Xeon and Athlon have 2GB PC2100 registered DDR. > > > The code fits in 70 MB of RAM. > > > > > > Ivan > > > > Right, but many p4's, like the e7500 chipset based p4 dual motherboards, > > use two banks of DDR, where as all todays Athlon duals use one bank of > > DDR memory. Sadly the only dual memory bus athlon I know of is nvidia's > > low end desktop motherboard. > > I swear someone just said in the other thread that the Tyan 246x was > two banks of DDR... true? > Well, the E7500 chipset has two DDR _channels_ while the AMD762 system controller has one DDR _channel_. One DDR channel is 64bit + ECC and is normally running at 133MHz which gives us a theoretical peak performance of 2.1 GBytes/sec per channel. However, the E7500 chipset is only able to run the memory bus at 100MHz and with the interleaving of the two channels that gives us a theoretical peak performance of 3.2 GBytes/sec. I believe the term "banks" is related to the layout of the DIMMs and has nothing to do with the architecture of the system controller. Here are some stream numbers. The Athlon platform is Tyan S2466 equipped with two Athlon MP 1900+ (1.6 GHz), and the Xeon platform is SuperMicro P4DPR-6GM+ equipped with two Xeon 1.8 GHz (Prestonia). Athlon, 1 process : Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time Copy: 877.5785 0.0365 0.0365 0.0367 Scale: 801.7857 0.0400 0.0399 0.0402 Add: 894.9042 0.0537 0.0536 0.0539 Triad: 887.2120 0.0542 0.0541 0.0544 Athlon, 2 processes : Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time Copy: 1385.1016 0.0236 0.0231 0.0253 Scale: 1345.9527 0.0242 0.0238 0.0250 Add: 1168.2247 0.0419 0.0411 0.0425 Triad: 1210.0117 0.0405 0.0397 0.0473 Xeon, 1 process : Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time Copy: 1898.8954 0.0170 0.0169 0.0181 Scale: 1813.9614 0.0179 0.0176 0.0186 Add: 1839.8592 0.0265 0.0261 0.0274 Triad: 1826.2738 0.0266 0.0263 0.0274 Xeon, 2 processes : Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time Copy: 1160.5962 0.0297 0.0276 0.0311 Scale: 1261.8243 0.0269 0.0254 0.0275 Add: 1237.7180 0.0395 0.0388 0.0407 Triad: 1231.9053 0.0398 0.0390 0.0405 Regards, -- Steffen Persvold | Scalable Linux Systems | Try out the world's best mailto:sp at scali.com | http://www.scali.com | performing MPI implementation: Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 | - ScaMPI 1.13.8 - Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY | >320MBytes/s and <4uS latency
- Previous message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Next message: ATHLON vs XEON: number crunching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
