gromacs benchmark and quad Xeons
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jakob Oestergaard jakob at unthought.netTue Jun 18 11:48:10 PDT 2002
- Previous message: gromacs benchmark and quad Xeons
- Next message: gromacs benchmark and quad Xeons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Velocet wrote: ... > Are the original rpms for gromacs which are generally compiled for P2/MMX > going to be absolutely the worst possible situation for a Xeon? Or should > they work relatively near best-speed (minus missing SSE and SSE2 instructions, > though I dont even know if GCC gives the full set of either for a hand > compile). > > What's wrong here? Any ideas? I don't know gromacs, but I know that one bad compiler switch can mean a 10 *times* difference in performance. Easily. For performance testing/tuning I certainly wouldn't recommend using code you haven't compiled yourself. Also make sure that you use a compiler version that you are familiar with. There are *so* many possible variables - better have as few unknowns as possible. -- ................................................................ : jakob at unthought.net : And I see the elder races, : :.........................: putrid forms of man : : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, : : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. : :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
- Previous message: gromacs benchmark and quad Xeons
- Next message: gromacs benchmark and quad Xeons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
