PBFS: pros & contras
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ivan Oleynik oleynik at chuma.cas.usf.eduMon Jun 17 11:37:08 PDT 2002
- Previous message: PGI licensing
- Next message: PBFS: pros & contras
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We are trying to understand an importance of PBFS for the cluster environment in order to finalize our cluster configuration. People are saying that PBFS tremendously boost parallel IO especially for MPI type applications. At the same time, we have heard about several technical problems with PBFS related with its stability. In particular, beowulf engineers tell us that we have to have 2 IDE hard drives per node to have the system to survive in case of failure of one of 2 IDE HDs. Although we are mostly involved in scientific computing and not going to do any Gigabytes data mining, we are trying to have as universal system as possible in order to address properly the new type of problems that can appear on our horizon in the future. I would appreciate some input about the importance of PBFS for beowulf type systems, especially for the MPI type applications. How it is difficult to keep it up and running? Is there easy way to turn it off in case we won't not want it? Ivan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ivan I. Oleynik E-mail : oleynik at chuma.cas.usf.edu Department of Physics University of South Florida 4202 East Fowler Avenue Tel : (813) 974-8186 Tampa, Florida 33620-5700 Fax : (813) 974-5813 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: PGI licensing
- Next message: PBFS: pros & contras
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
