cluster frustrations (Suggestions for same)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduThu Jan 17 14:31:34 PST 2002
- Previous message: cluster frustrations (Suggestions for same)
- Next message: cluster frustrations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:29:05AM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > > > I totally agree with Mark here -- I can buy somewhere between 2 and 4 > > ECC-memory-equipped nodes over the counter from Intrex (my local vanilla > > PC supplier) for the cost of one server-class node of equivalent power > > One of the biggest sources of needless arguments on this list is > different definitions. Since when is the node you described first not > a "server-class node"? > > If you define "server-class" as "stuff from vendors with huge markups" > then sure, white boxes usable as servers are going to be cheaper. But > if you define "server class" as "boxes with certain features, such as > ECC memory", it's a whole different discussion. > > We get similar discussions over "commodity", "beowulf", "cluster", etc > etc. All good points and true. I certainly didn't want to start a semantic argument over what is a server class system since you'll get different answers from nearly anybody you ask depending on what they want to serve, their tolerance for problems, the features they require (e.g. hot swap disks or power supplies) and the depth of their pocketbook. I was actually referencing the ~$2.5K/ea "server class" boxes that were mentioned (IIRC in my normally somewhat confused mental state;-) in this very thread. However, I also generally build my own "servers" for half that, give or take, depending as you note on detailed features like SCSI, ECC, amount of disk, local backup device or no. With linux especially virtually any OTC system sold down to weenie and aged Celerons can be a server (and a damn good server at that) to a small cluster or departmental LAN. Most of them will simply run for years flawlessly when turned on and correctly configured. A few won't. A high performance cluster (or server) needs to be engineered a bit more carefully, but the same really holds true there as well. The point was more "You don't have to spend a fortune to get reliable, high quality OTC nodes, but you do have to be a smart shopper" than "server-class (with reference to nodes or otherwise) means anything at all" to anybody but marketing and management. Cheerfully corrected, rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: cluster frustrations (Suggestions for same)
- Next message: cluster frustrations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
