Intel E7500 versus ServerWorks GC-LE/HE
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jarrod Smith jsmith at structbio.vanderbilt.eduThu Feb 28 09:14:47 PST 2002
- Previous message: Intel E7500 versus ServerWorks GC-LE/HE
- Next message: Intel E7500 versus ServerWorks GC-LE/HE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Steven Timm wrote: > I would be interested also to hear people's opinion > on why either the Intel E7500 (=Plumas) and the Serverworks GC-HE > chipsets are supposed to be better than the I860-based > systems which offer RDRAM? Why is there such a push to > get chipsets that support DDR SDRAM--especially when the > price isn't much different anymore? I don't know all the reasons. One of them that's been discussed here is a sub-par PCI implementation. But (correct me if I'm wrong) the fact that Intel themselves never produced a motherboard based on their own I860 chipset should be some indication of its limitations. -- Jarrod A. Smith, Ph.D. Asst. Director, Center for Structural Biology Research Asst. Professor, Biochemistry Vanderbilt University
- Previous message: Intel E7500 versus ServerWorks GC-LE/HE
- Next message: Intel E7500 versus ServerWorks GC-LE/HE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
