/. MS vs. university Beowulfs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Nelson john at computation.comFri Feb 22 16:51:46 PST 2002
- Previous message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Next message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I can't imagine what advantage there would be to moving to an insecure, unreliable, MS operating system with Qos issues... oh and you'd have to pay for each and every licence of the OS. All you would accompish is to pad MS's bottom line and provide the company with an advertizing opportunity... there is no technical justification for such a move. -- John >>Here's the problem: my understanding is that an MS rep asked what it would >>take to get them to switch to a Microsoft cluster. Is this possible? Are >>there MS clusters that do what Beowulf clusters are capable of? I thought >>MS clusters were for load balancing, not computation... which is the >>hoped-for goal of this project. Can the Slashdot crowd offer some advice? >> -- _____________________________________________________ John T. Nelson President | Computation.com Inc mail: | john at computation.com company: | http://www.computation.com/ laboratories: | http://www.computation.org/ _____________________________________________________ "Providing quality IT consulting services since 1992"
- Previous message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Next message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
