/. MS vs. university Beowulfs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugene Leitl Eugene.Leitl at lrz.uni-muenchen.deFri Feb 22 07:42:06 PST 2002
- Previous message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Next message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Velocet wrote: > Have fun wading through the blind linux advocacy and silly jokes to try > and find any content. Um, I wasn't suggesting you to read it. I was suggesting writing a few comments, trying to educate slashdotties about the issues. > If someone can summarize any real information they grok from this massive > thread (ie how good is computational clustering on M$), please post it here. NT 4.0 did suck bigtime on IP QoS, I don't see the reasons why Win2k should do differently. Even not to mention node licenses, and stability.
- Previous message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Next message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list