g77 compiler and mpif77 compiler in SCYLD
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Edwards Arthur edwards at icantbelieveimdoingthis.comThu Feb 21 14:43:01 PST 2002
- Previous message: external raid arrays
- Next message: LAM channel bonding problem solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm using the older (-7) version of the free SCYLD and I have found that the mpif77 compiler gives about half the speed of g77 at the same level of optimization. Also, it behaves in a very unstable way when one uses individual optimization commands (-fcse-follow-jumps, for example). The calculation can simply blow up. At the same time, it seems to share some instability with the g77 compiler. We are using a Sandia DFT code, QUEST, and -O2 and -O3 lead to substantial differences in computed results. I have found that the optimization call -fcaller-saves is the culprit in QUEST and that its absence leads to no degradation in performance on a standard non-SCYLD linux box. Also using -O2 -fcaller-saves doesn't lead to really bizarre behavior. It even gives completely correct results, even though it is half as fast as a normal serial Linux box. So, I have the newer free version (from Cheap-bytes) and I'm thinking of upgrading. Is the new mpif77 compiler actually optimized better? Is the newer (-8) SCYLD substantially better in other ways? Are there any problems with the upgrade? Art Edwards
- Previous message: external raid arrays
- Next message: LAM channel bonding problem solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
