Ethernet Flowcontrol...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Northrup bill at billnorthrup.comSun Feb 17 14:31:00 PST 2002
- Previous message: how does MPI know
- Next message: Dell Precision 530 + MPICH
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello everyone. I was just about to begin some network tuning and wanted to get some input from the list. We have a few gig devices that talk to other gig devices as well as the lesser Fast Ethernet nodes. I am well aware of the gig frame padding, latency and such with gig e. However I was wondering if anyone is using flow control both rx and tx or asym to help with packet flow? For instance I have a gig master that is trying to shove everything down a fast e pipe at the switch. Should one just enable TX flow control on the gig segment? The other way from fast e to gig e wouldn't be an issue, right? Does relying on the network for flow control reduce the overhead encountered on any of the machines or possibly off load it to the network devices that may do it better? I'll report back to the list what I find, but everyone's mileage is different. Thanks Bill
- Previous message: how does MPI know
- Next message: Dell Precision 530 + MPICH
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
