Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

low-latency high-bandwidth OS bypass user-level messaging for commodity(linux) clusters with commodity NICs(<$200), HELP! (GAMMA/EMP/M-VIA/etc.)

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

jon jcmcknny at uiuc.edu
Mon Dec 16 22:12:30 PST 2002


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Becker [mailto:becker at scyld.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:32 PM
> To: jon
> Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org
> Subject: Re: low-latency high-bandwidth OS bypass user-level messaging
for
> commodity(linux) clusters with commodity NICs(<$200), HELP!
(GAMMA/EMP/M-VIA/etc.)
> 
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, jon wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps this isn't the best way to get ahold of you, but I've also
sent
> > this to the Beowulf list.  I've noted your comments on OS Bypass
drivers
> > in the past.  But isn't there some room for non-TCP/IP related
traffic,
> > such as with computing clusters?  We don't need no stinking TCP!  No
> > associated revenue?  You could replace Myrinet in the thousands of
nodes
> > we have here ALONE at NCSA.
> 
> Very likely not.  Myrinet has both a cost and increasing performance
> advantage over gigabit Ethernet when the switch is larger than about
96
> ports.

[jon] I see.

> 
> > We (UIUC theoretical astrophysics group) are in the midst of
purchasing
> > a $50K cluster (I know, small, but big for us! :)) and I'm done all
the
> > research as to what we should be getting.  We ended up going with a
> > Intel Desktop gigabit board and P4, but have found the tests to be
very
> > poor.  We only have 4 nodes right now because we worried about this
very
> > thing.
> 
> Latency or bandwidth?  And what are you using to test?

[jon] We need (projected 0 message size) latencies to be about 30-40us
for our applications.  We end up with message sizes ranging from
256bytes to 8KB for different applications.  A 2.4Ghz P4 cluster has an
idling CPU due to the latency.

> While there are better Gigabit chips than the DP83820, most of its bad
> reputation comes from the poor performance of the other drivers out
> there.  We get quite reasonable performance from it with the Scyld
> ns820.c driver.  Others have reported a 2.5-3X performance improvement
> over the driver written by Red Hat.

[jon] I see, what kinda of 0message latency and peak bandwidth do you
get on 64-bit 66Mhz bus?

[jon] Thanks! -Jon





More information about the Beowulf mailing list