low-latency high-bandwidth OS bypass user-level messaging for commodity(linux) clusters with commodity NICs(<$200), HELP! (GAMMA/EMP/M-VIA/etc.)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
jon jcmcknny at uiuc.eduMon Dec 16 22:12:30 PST 2002
- Previous message: low-latency high-bandwidth OS bypass user-level messaging for commodity(linux) clusters with commodity NICs(<$200), HELP! (GAMMA/EMP/M-VIA/etc.)
- Next message: 12/17/2002, 17:28 - Need info !
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Becker [mailto:becker at scyld.com] > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:32 PM > To: jon > Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: Re: low-latency high-bandwidth OS bypass user-level messaging for > commodity(linux) clusters with commodity NICs(<$200), HELP! (GAMMA/EMP/M-VIA/etc.) > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, jon wrote: > > > Perhaps this isn't the best way to get ahold of you, but I've also sent > > this to the Beowulf list. I've noted your comments on OS Bypass drivers > > in the past. But isn't there some room for non-TCP/IP related traffic, > > such as with computing clusters? We don't need no stinking TCP! No > > associated revenue? You could replace Myrinet in the thousands of nodes > > we have here ALONE at NCSA. > > Very likely not. Myrinet has both a cost and increasing performance > advantage over gigabit Ethernet when the switch is larger than about 96 > ports. [jon] I see. > > > We (UIUC theoretical astrophysics group) are in the midst of purchasing > > a $50K cluster (I know, small, but big for us! :)) and I'm done all the > > research as to what we should be getting. We ended up going with a > > Intel Desktop gigabit board and P4, but have found the tests to be very > > poor. We only have 4 nodes right now because we worried about this very > > thing. > > Latency or bandwidth? And what are you using to test? [jon] We need (projected 0 message size) latencies to be about 30-40us for our applications. We end up with message sizes ranging from 256bytes to 8KB for different applications. A 2.4Ghz P4 cluster has an idling CPU due to the latency. > While there are better Gigabit chips than the DP83820, most of its bad > reputation comes from the poor performance of the other drivers out > there. We get quite reasonable performance from it with the Scyld > ns820.c driver. Others have reported a 2.5-3X performance improvement > over the driver written by Red Hat. [jon] I see, what kinda of 0message latency and peak bandwidth do you get on 64-bit 66Mhz bus? [jon] Thanks! -Jon
- Previous message: low-latency high-bandwidth OS bypass user-level messaging for commodity(linux) clusters with commodity NICs(<$200), HELP! (GAMMA/EMP/M-VIA/etc.)
- Next message: 12/17/2002, 17:28 - Need info !
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
