Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comSun Dec 1 05:10:41 PST 2002
- Previous message: Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
- Next message: Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 04:53, Kragen Sitaker wrote: > Don Becker writes: > > Improve in what way? IPv6 is slower and more complex. > > IIRC, the designers of IPv6 left out the parts of IPv4 that tended to > bottleneck routers, like recalculating header checksums after > decrementing the TTL; they intended to make IPv6 faster than IPv4 on > the same amount of hardware. I guess you think they failed? Do you think it will make a bit of a difference at the MPI level ? There are some characteristics of long distance networking that you will never change, like the speed of light. IPv4 or IPv6, don't expect good performance running MPI codes across the Internet, unless there is no communication. When the Grid Computing community will finally realize that... :-) Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray, Phd Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
- Next message: Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
