Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kragen Sitaker kragen at pobox.comSun Dec 1 01:53:18 PST 2002
- Previous message: Java clustering....
- Next message: Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Don Becker writes: > Improve in what way? IPv6 is slower and more complex. IIRC, the designers of IPv6 left out the parts of IPv4 that tended to bottleneck routers, like recalculating header checksums after decrementing the TTL; they intended to make IPv6 faster than IPv4 on the same amount of hardware. I guess you think they failed? -- <kragen at pobox.com> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/> Edsger Wybe Dijkstra died in August of 2002. The world has lost a great man. See http://advogato.org/person/raph/diary.html?start=252 and http://www.kode-fu.com/geek/2002_08_04_archive.shtml for details.
- Previous message: Java clustering....
- Next message: Availability of MPI over inet2 protocol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list