Kidger's comments on Quadric's design and performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Richard Fryer richard_fryer at charter.netMon Apr 22 10:01:08 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Maximum room temperature
- Next message: Kidger's comments on Quadric's design and performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:06:00 +0100 Daniel Kidger <Daniel.Kidger at quadrics.com> wrote: > after all as well as having the fastest line-speed, the Quadrics > interconnect sends all data as virtual addresses (the NIC has its > own MMU and TLB). That way any process can read and write > the memory of any other node without any CPU overhead. I appreciate getting a bit of technical detail on Quadrics interfaces. Is there a web location that might provide more information - comparative benchmarks or protocol information or ??? This message also reminded me to ask if a long-held opinion is valid - and that opinion is "that a cache coherent interconnect would offer performance enhancement when applications are at the 'more tightly coupled' end of the spectrum." I know that present PCI based interfaces can't do that without invoking software overhead and latencies. Anyone have data - or an argument for invalidating this opinion? I did recently read that the AMD 'HyperTransport' interfaces ARE capable of cache coherent transactions. This would appear to allow protocols (such as SCI) that support cache coherence to operate in that mode. But I wonder if it matters to the MPI world. Seems to me that it would be a factor in improving scalability (providing that other interconnect issues such as bandwidth bottlenecks) don't prevent it. My recollection is that the SCI simulations I saw required very little added traffic to maintain coherency. Also a brief note about the Dolphin product line, since the issue of link saturation has come up: - they DO also sell switches - or at least offer them. And if you check the SCI specification, you'll see that there are some elaborate discussions of fabric architectures that the protocol supports and switches enable. What I DO NOT know is if the SCALI software supports switch-based operation, and also don't know what the impact is on the system cost per node. My 'inexperienced' assessment of the appeal in the Dolphin family is that you can start without the switch and later add it if the performance benefit warrents. That's what I'd say if I were selling them anyway - and didn't know otherwise. :-) Richard Fryer rfryer at beomax.com
- Previous message: Maximum room temperature
- Next message: Kidger's comments on Quadric's design and performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
