decreasing #define HZ in the linux kernel for CPU/memory bound apps ?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at keyresearch.comTue Apr 16 08:31:46 PDT 2002
- Previous message: decreasing #define HZ in the linux kernel for CPU/memory bound apps ?
- Next message: decreasing #define HZ in the linux kernel for CPU/memory bound apps ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:57:18PM +0200, Cabaniols, Sebastien wrote: > Would it be interesting to decrease the #define HZ in the linux kernel > for CPU/Memory bound computationnal farms ? > (I just posted the same question to lkml) All pre-compiled user programs would then have the wrong HZ. So /bin/time wouldn't work anymore. As for "what HZ would be a good value?", Alpha has always used 1000, and it isn't a significant performance hit. But x86 started life on much slower machines, and now we're stuck with 100, unless you want to rebuild ALL your packages. I suspect IA64 uses 100 for compatibility reasons. I wonder how the x86 emulator on AlphaLinux got around this... hm... greg
- Previous message: decreasing #define HZ in the linux kernel for CPU/memory bound apps ?
- Next message: decreasing #define HZ in the linux kernel for CPU/memory bound apps ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
