Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bob Campbell lindragoon at yahoo.comThu Oct 18 11:36:28 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Next message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
what about ROMIO? how does this perform with GM? --- Greg Lindahl <lindahl at conservativecomputer.com> wrote: > > Anyone have experience with these high speed network devices? I'm > > starting out with a 32 node cluster doing bioinformatics. The jobs > will > > be high I/O probably through NFS, thus the need for some high speed > > connectivity between the nodes. > > Note that if you aren't using NFS, the answer can be very different. > Let's say, for example, that instead of reading your databases via > NFS, you copy them to your local disk using the "gmcp" program (which > doesn't exist yet, but it works like rcp, only it uses gm). "gmcp" > should have much lower overhead than NFS or rcp, so your networking > might stop being the bottleneck, and instead your disks could be the > bottleneck. > > As for systems actually using GM over NFS in production, the FSL > system in Boulder does. Craig Tierney got it working, and I think > they're happy with the stability. > > greg > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com
- Previous message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Next message: Giganet vs. Myrinet vs. gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
