DUPLICATE MESSAGES ON THIS LIST - Compaq makes mess again

[hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz]

Once again, misconfigured mailer at Compaq site sends list messages
back to this list (and most likely to ANY list) and makes them to look
like duplicates from the original author.

Now it comes via zmamail04.zma.compaq.com.

(Last time it came via zcamail4.zca.compaq.com and zcamail5.zca.compaq.com)

If you think somebody is mad, it is not you or the message author, it
is Compaq postmaster. If they do have any.

Regards

Vaclav

> Subject: RE: beowulf.org list problems
> From: Peter Bowen <pzb at scyld.com>
> To: hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz
> Cc: Nathalie.Viollet at Compaq.com
> Date: 01 Nov 2001 08:57:49 -0500
> X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.31.15.22 (Preview Release)
> 
> I have marked all messages from zcamail[0-9]*.zca.compaq.com for hand
> moderation.  I expect that this mailer problem will be fixed, but if I
> see messages caught on or after Nov 8, I will disable all offending
> mailing list memberships.
> 
> I do not like taking harsh measures, but clearly this is causing
> problems for many people, and is caused by a simple server
> misconfiguration.
> 
> Thanks.
> Peter
> 
> On Thu, 2001-11-01 at 05:27, hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz wrote:
> > Peter,
> > 
> > > If I see this re-occur, I will take appropriate measures
> > 
> > It re-occured. Please blacklist them, those Compaq guys are
> > unable to mend their mailer. Beowulf list is unusable with this mess
> > included.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Vaclav
> > 
> > -------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > > Subject: RE: beowulf.org list problems
> > > From: Peter Bowen <pzb at scyld.com>
> > > To: hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz
> > > Cc: Nathalie.Viollet at Compaq.com
> > > Date: 29 Oct 2001 10:13:04 -0500
> > > X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15.99 (Preview Release)
> > > 
> > > I am no longer seeing duplicate posts on the list, and, therefore, will
> > > not be blacklisting zcamail?.zca.compaq.com from beowulf.org lists.  If
> > > I see this re-occur, I will take appropriate measures at that time.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > Peter
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 04:29, hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz wrote:
> > > > Hi Nathalie,
> > > > 
> > > > thanks for swift reaction.
> > > > 
> > > > > But I did not know that my e-mail were forwarded many time
> > > > 
> > > > Your mail was OK, it were messages of OTHER people which got repeated
> > > > by your site (and made to look like repeated mail).
> > > > 
> > > > You will also find (as everybody else subscribed to beowulf) those copies
> > > > in your personal mailbox (if you kept beowulf messages delivered to
> > > > you). Last repeated message I got was from Ron Chen (Subject: Re:
> > > > [PBS-USERS] SC2001 technical papers online).
> > > > 
> > > > Second copy of this message went this way:
> > > > 
> > > >  Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104])
> > > > 	by blueraja.scyld.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9T27l032336
> > > > 	for <beowulf at beowulf.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:07:47 -0500
> > > >  Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
> > > > 	id 5AB25F9A; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:10:34 -0800 (PST)
> > > >  Received: from excmun-gh01.dem.cpqcorp.net (excmun-gh01.dem.cpqcorp.net [16.41.88.60])
> > > > 	by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
> > > > 	id 7D447E4D; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:10:32 -0800 (PST)
> > > >  Received: by excmun-gh01.dem.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
> > > > 	id <VQTWWW1H>; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 03:07:36 +0100
> > > > 
> > > > Here is a list of messages like this (first is your regular post,
> > > > others are probably copies of other people's mails):
> > > > 
> > > >  ~/Mail/beowulf>for x in `fgrep -l .zca.compaq.com *`; do fgrep Subject $x; done
> > > > 
> > > >  Subject: 2.4 network booted kernel
> > > >  Subject: Re: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Re: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: Core files under mpich, p4 device
> > > >  Subject: Re: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: Add host in PVM
> > > >  Subject: Killer SCSI 1 TB fileserver
> > > >  Subject: Core files under mpich, p4 device
> > > >  Subject: Re: PBS x SGE comparison?
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Re: SGE and Scyld
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Re: Core files under mpich, p4 device
> > > >  Subject: Re: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
> > > >  Subject: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: Re: PBS x SGE comparison?
> > > >  Subject: Re: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Killer SCSI 1 TB fileserver
> > > >  Subject: Failed to mount using Scyld
> > > >  Subject: Re: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: good commodity NIC
> > > >  Subject: RE: using mpich 1.2.2.2 with ifc
> > > >  Subject: Add host in PVM
> > > >  Subject: Re: [PBS-USERS] SC2001 technical papers online
> > > >  
> > > > Please forward this additional explanation to your site adminsitrator
> > > > (unless (s)he already knows for sure what was going on).
> > > > 
> > > > Regards
> > > > 
> > > > Vaclav
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>