MPI/Beowulf vs. SM Programming/OpenMP
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Richard Adams chrisa at ASPATECH.COM.BRFri Mar 23 06:06:37 PST 2001
- Previous message: I need a start point
- Next message: OT: computationally hard or not (algorithm question)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi everyone; I've been coding for almost 5 years in a mix of C, Java and now Python. I am now focused on learning more about parallel programming for applications/algorithms related to genetic sequencial analysis within databases - bioinformatics. The last month or so I've been studying about different methods that exist and I'm getting confused about where to start. I was convinced after reading material on Beowulf that it was the way to go, but I've recently stumbled upon the OpenMP site and read more about shared memory techniques. It seems to me for the type of applications I'm focusing on...this is a much better approach because I don't have to spend so much time learning MPI and all the communications. I can just focus on learning the algorthms (this is their big sell point anyway). 1.) Is this really true? 2.) Can anyone point out how Beowulf/MPI is the better solution and learning path? 3.) Is their room for both Beowulf/MPI and Shared-Mem tech. in the future? I would really appreciate hearing your feedback. Regards, Chris
- Previous message: I need a start point
- Next message: OT: computationally hard or not (algorithm question)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
