Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Felix Rauch rauch at inf.ethz.chMon Mar 19 15:10:02 PST 2001
- Previous message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Next message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Leonardo Magallon wrote: > When we start our job here, the switch passes no more than 31mb/s at > any moment. It could very well be the case that this number is the maximum that the NFS server can deliver. We had a diploma thesis here in 1999 [1] which examined the performance of NFS on Linux with various parameters such as CPU speed, network, etc. At that time, a 400 MHz PII as NFS server could not deliver more than 25 MB/s from the cache to an NFS client over Gigabit Ethernet (for large single files). And that was only possible with the optimal configuration for short times. Sustained bandwith was lower. I don't know the details of your server, but 35 MB/s seems likely to be the maximum that the NFS servers memory system and CPU can deliver. Did you try TCP measurements to see what the network can deliver? TCP performance should be higher than NFS performance. - Felix [1] http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/stricker/sada/archive/isele.[html|pdf] -- Felix Rauch | Email: rauch at inf.ethz.ch Institute for Computer Systems | Homepage: http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/~rauch/ ETH Zentrum / RZ H18 | Phone: ++41 1 632 7489 CH - 8092 Zuerich / Switzerland | Fax: ++41 1 632 1307
- Previous message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Next message: Cluster and RAID 5 Array bottleneck.( I believe)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
