AMD annoyed...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduMon Mar 19 10:10:13 PST 2001
- Previous message: AMD annoyed...
- Next message: AMD annoyed...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Schilling, Richard wrote: > Robert, > > It's up to you, but I think the key is that you mention you have no existing > agreement with AMD. Without a non-disclosure on your work, then AMD has > effectively given you permission to publish whatever you want. You have to > believe that they are aware of the implications of non-disclosure - they do > this all the time with companies. If you're concerned, call them to verify > how they feel about it - they should be very open with you. But, don't make > a decision based on speculation (get an official ruling from the company). Eventually I will, but I suspect that the company that gave me the account as a courtesy (ASL) had a NDA with AMD and that their non-publication restriction was not communicated between different management levels of the company (and hence not to me -- if they had but told me I would have been happy enough to comply anyway if that was a condition of getting the account). I agree that AMD has no legal recourse against me if I choose to publish at this point, but they might well choose to punish the company that gave me the account. Any old guys remember the National Lampoon cover: "Buy this magazine or we'll shoot this dog"? Well, I have no particular desire for ASL to get shot for being nice enough to give me an account. Besides, I wasn't finished -- some of the tests I was working on were producing the most "interesting" results. I'm not comfortable publishing these results anyway without more work. I have various things to do this week (including teach, as Duke has started up again post-spring break). One of them is to post the sources used in the benchmarking for comment -- I've just started to add a link to source packages into the http://www.phy.duke.edu/brahma/dual_athlon site both as a resource and as an RFC. When this task is completed I'll try contacting AMD directly so they can look over the stuff I was running (and any comments). They can then run the tests themselves to help them decide when it is "safe" to release me. In the meantime, my time isn't totally being wasted. rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: AMD annoyed...
- Next message: AMD annoyed...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
