Power-managment of slave nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kyle Sheumaker ksheumaker at advancedclustering.comTue Mar 6 12:09:53 PST 2001
- Previous message: Power-managment of slave nodes
- Next message: Power-managment of slave nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have played with wake-on-lan and not had a lot of luck. It is a special packet (http://www.scyld.com/expert/wake-on-lan.html), but some motherboards / nics just don't seem to want to "wake." They aren't cheap but I would suggest something like the APC masterswitch, it's a network controllable power switch (http://www.apc.com/products/masterswitch/index.cfm). I've used them before their pretty cool, web, telnet, and SNMP controllable. -- Kyle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Marsden" <marsden at scripps.edu> To: <beowulf at beowulf.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Power-managment of slave nodes > Dear all, > > I look after a 96 processor, 48 node, Pentium III linux cluster. The > owners have just received their first electricity bill for the machine and > unsuprisingly have had a nasty shock! They are now desperate to find ways > to keep the bill as low as possible. > > One solution put forward has been to have nodes shut themselves down > using APM when not in use. Then when a node is needed for a job, it could > be switched back on via wake-on-LAN on the ethernet card. I see a number of > problems associated with this: > > 1) APM is not supported under Linux 2.2 for SMP. However I believe that it > is for 2.4 - can anyone comment on this? > 2) Wake-on-LAN - I'm not 100% clear on whether this listens for a specific > packet or whether it will just fire the machine up if a packet comes > along with the NICs MAC address. If the later is the case I think we > are snookered since we use PBS as the queueing system which I believe > sends out packets to query nodes every now and then. > > Before I spend more time delving deeper into these problems, has anyone > ever attempted to try to do all of this? If so, what are the perils and > pitfalls? Is this a completely crazy idea? > > Thanks > > Brian. > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Brian Marsden Email: marsden at scripps.edu > TSRI, San Diego, USA. Phone: +1 858 784 8698 Fax: +1 858 784 8299 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: Power-managment of slave nodes
- Next message: Power-managment of slave nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
