Cluster via USB
becker at scyld.com
Fri Mar 2 07:07:26 PST 2001
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Timm Murray wrote:
> The new standard looks good (512 Gb/s, IIRC),
480Mb/sec, with larger block sizes so the overhead isn't as bad as with
the current version. Expect to see the first chipset implementations no
sooner than a year from now, with the hardware showing up before then
being developer prototypes.
> but current USB just isn't fast enough for a lot of things...
Yes, it's way too slow. The effective transfer rate is 6-10Mb/s, with
7Mb/s the typical real-life result. That's slower than old Ethernet,
which was too slow for typical applications in 1994.
> However, the new standard may give a better price/performance
> ratio then gigabit ethernet or Myrinet, depending on how well
> IP-over-USB scales.
> On a somewhat related note, what about FireWire?
Both USB 2.0 and Firewire have the same problem: the availability of
switches to build large system.
Donald Becker becker at scyld.com
Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters
Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
More information about the Beowulf