Scyld: memory leak or just caching?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
W Bauske wsb at paralleldata.comWed Jun 27 15:34:15 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Scyld: memory leak or just caching?
- Next message: Also problems with NFS now.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Weller wrote:
>
> Will this memory be freed as I need it? Is this a memory leak, or
> is it just caching an enormous amount of disk IO?
>
> Nothing under the SZ column shows where the memory went (if it weren't
> the kernel). The PRI and NI values for mdrecoverd are out of wack.
> It's like this without the fscking as well, so I'm sure it's not related.
>
> Any comments?
It looks like caching. Free tells you exactly what you want to
know if you look at the line that starts with:
-/+ buffers/cache:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1572388 981856 590532 0 852032 18244
-/+ buffers/cache: 111580 1460808
Swap: 2097136 4 2097132
It says your system actually has 1460808KB available for applications.
I'd suggest you look at "man free".
Wes
- Previous message: Scyld: memory leak or just caching?
- Next message: Also problems with NFS now.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
