partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduFri Jun 1 12:08:32 PDT 2001
- Previous message: partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting
- Next message: partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Nordwall, Douglas J wrote: > I guess the question I have got to ask is if it is still practical to run with > 2xmemory when you start reaching up into large memory? I assume this is only if > you ever hit swap... As Greg and I both said, the system will use swap if it exists for various optimizations whether or not an application actually swaps, although it sounds like 2.4.x might be a bit weak still on the optimizations. So far I haven't hit a lot of the instabilities personally, but neither have I hammered on any of my 2.4.x based systems. Soon. As for practicality, the LARGEST physical memory you are likely to have is 1.5-2 GB per node, although there may be some deep-pocketed or custom engineered exceptions -- one restriction is that a lot of the P3, P4 and Athlon motherboards and chipsets come with only 2-4 slots and 512 MB DIMMS are the biggest that are commonly available (at least) to fill them. The SMALLEST local disk you are likely to have on a new system is 10-20 GB; 20 GB disks are just dropping to the roughly $100 price point which seems to be the practical minimum amount vendors are willing to sell hard disks for. This means that you can easily do up to 4 GB for swap and still have at LEAST 6 GB for the OS and application scratch space, if not 16 GB. Hard disk has historically gotten bigger and cheaper faster than DRAM of any sort, often doubling more than once at constant cost in a single year. This situation will therefore likely persist indefinitely even in the teeth of Moore's Law for at least a few more years. So yes, it is practical. If you have a (10 GB or bigger) node hard disk at all you would be slightly crazy not to make a nice big swap. If you don't, you should try to get a lot of memory since we ALL agree that if any of your applications actually swap to disk (for more than a tiny bit of time in a given computation, at any rate), you lose big time. I like having a nice big VM on a node or workstation configuration to avoid instant systems death on a memory leak or load peak or when running a memory pig (there are a number of memory-hog workstation apps: mathematica, netscape, acroread, some of the hi-res graphics tools), but I try never to actually use it as "swap". rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting
- Next message: partitioning HD for use of swap & for booting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
