Channel bonding performance problem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Hao He haohe at me1.eng.wayne.eduThu Jul 19 03:17:58 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Better than RAID.. (fwd)
- Next message: Channel bonding performance problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi there. I just finished some channel bonding test with 2 Dual-3C905-NIC PCs. But the network performance is only a little bit higher than single NIC case. I don't know why. Following are the details: Node configuration: Intel Pentium III Dual 3C905 NIC Redhat 7.1 (2.4.2) When Linux installed, I created bond0 and modified modules.conf and ifcfg-eth0, ifcfg-eth1, ifcfg-bond0 according the mini-Howto. After rebooting the system, I saw that channel bonding was sucessful since by running ifconfig, I found bond0, eth0, eth1 had same IP address and MAC address. Then I installed netperf 2.1. I have to removed most default arguments to compile it on my system. When I just did local test by netperf, the result looked good. The speed was more than 700Mbps, doubled from before. However, when I tested the network performance between the 2 nodes, I found the improvement is quite limited, say, only about 10% (from 90Mbps to 100Mbps). I checked the system by running ifconfig. It seems the bonding worked well because the RX, TX data of the 2 NICs are almost equal which means the communication task are assigned averagely to the 2 cards. Then I tried to FTP a big file( 115MB) between the two nodes. This time I got a average speed of about 9.2MB/s. Seems this speed is doubled then before. So I am confused. I don't know why and how to solve this problem. Any suggestion and help from you will be highly appreciated. Thank you! Best regards, Hao He
- Previous message: Better than RAID.. (fwd)
- Next message: Channel bonding performance problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
