SBC and beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Pedro Díaz Jiménez pdiaz88 at terra.esMon Jul 16 12:19:21 PDT 2001
- Previous message: SBC and beowulf
- Next message: BLAST and other parallel sequence comparison programs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 16 July 2001 16:25, Chris Black wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:08:35PM +0000, Pedro Díaz Jiménez wrote: > > Hi Beowulf people, > > > > Does anyone here has had experiences with SBC (single board computer) > > beowulfs?. I find it a very interesting topic in cluster building > > techniques, > > [stuff deleted] > > > If anyone has had that experiences I will greatly apreciate that he/she > > could answer some questions I have in mind. I'm mainly interested in > > cost-efective (probably x86) SBC with PCI interface (if feel that VME is > > a little offtopic for a beowulf,isn't it?). The main questions I have > > are: > > [questions deleted] > standard disclaimer: Newbie to SBC clusters. I've been investigating for a while, but since I've never played with such clusters, all my opinions are speculative > The main questions *I* would have about SBC clusters are: > 1) Would it be cost effective? > It seems that SBCs are more expensive for the same amount of > CPU power and memory than rackmount nodes with standard motherboards. > For what I've seen, It depends heavily on the configuration you choose. Some sparc and mips models are actualy cheaper than a sun/sgi/whatever rackmountable server. On the x86 field, The cheapest SBC I've seen is a 175 pounds Pentium III from SpireTech (http://www.spire.co.uk) here : http://planetcluster.org/links.php?op=viewslink&sid=30 are links to others SBC vendors I've found The SBC market seems to be oriented to the embedded/industrial world (not a surprise). Almost all SBC models I've seen are low MHZ RISC CPUs aimed to replace microcontrolers in areas where a little more of computational power is needed. I've seen a few vendors selling high performance SBC for scientific work and advanced electronics (weapons and that stuff) and some of those vendors offer CompactPCI interfaces as well as the omnipresent VME > 2) What would be the benefit? > I assume it would be space/power/cooling? > Mainly, thats my opinion. And the posibility to expand/upgrade a cluster in a space-limited place. Here are more benefits/applications (my opinion): a) High Availability: The SBC monitors the hardware/software state of the host computer. Since it is an autonomous computer It can take the control in a host computer hardware/software failure as long as the PCI power lines doesn't fail b) Dedicated hardware: Much in the way that DSP multiprocessors work, which would let the host CPU to work on other tasks or simply maintain the OS. Is it possible an SBC-HOST communication across the PCI bus? Cheers Pedro > Chris - ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Attachment: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: - ---------------------------------------- - -- __________________________________________________ / \ | Pedro Diaz Jimenez | | | | pdiaz88 at terra.es pdiaz at acm.asoc.fi.upm.es | | | | | | http://planetcluster.org | | Clustering & H.P.C. news and documentation | | | | There are no stupid questions, but there's a lot | | of inquisitve idiots | | Anonymous | | | | "I find your lack of faith disturbing." | | Darth Vader, Star Wars Episode IV | \__________________________________________________/ - -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDqcGZsRBADFIahNPLk8suMlS39m8RqatLgX4dO7PU2F5p1oVvkyB7PaLQCv FREWwfrjGpxAjRnxyZ4TdaFi1oCP495t5R2CdjPZu0EfjsEqosdLXkjDsKl2n4Wo Afb6BaHMJS5PADEI0QfpZOkB8OruAZja/oGmn5rThyjgCxWHUuK1ArmeGwCg7+9a owg9wP1RohePHJSDB9d2HYMD/i7z1X4ev+K90LumgJwSWlScJ7MEip5rw4wqGOkK lF/C2nTYsoX5CVEn/pu7hROL/BWIYtBgkNDaEjsVsyb+4KjQXcZUW5l3ADipWYx2 r9s4sFfeZ9nfhDcG0aNYRcCNkYSZ/WxUkXS8UjVEAEhkFu1BA+6UZmeq3pKtJZTR +HqKA/9zRmgTon36zt2qe9eiR6DyY0EpGEI0iY+KYX6GC/wxizeHBw0FW1eOEoxF GjtxdBv/U9vi7Vgav6aY+pr4la5q6jVabe03Y8yGDFeL8jM+lqww1rzpABiGrF+W qge65zCUjL3jJE5+5yi+KcRyllb1OA7uXQTtsRw+TGq9Dvaaz7QwUGVkcm8gRGlh eiBKaW1lbmV6IChCLk8uRi5ILikgPHBkaWF6ODhAdGVycmEuZXM+iFYEExECABYF AjqcGZsECwoEAwMVAwIDFgIBAheAAAoJEJ7ud33hGMZRj20An2Ce4S/vBTuZDxnL WFBrJRnc3UdaAKDnIPNRbz7r4dh9AuBcpbCE1pQ/SLkBDQQ6nBmqEAQAr7O07Dws 5zAbQvm1hwGthXKCHtIIuWCPdX/XkNG6ZxV/cXgs4LI4oAg3GhttD2JIEk2SoVXE FOf/wIddIDz70/9mIZavMvpR31LxBFSJk0Up3caOvThM90wMttRi7tg7cf04rrMM Phy8T5bOIW/q5SMwZffbJXD7bA0/jDLdQ6MAAwYD/1emSwNTzOOmMCZadoEBpKIE HA35P2/m/SsCI+pQ/OKXKPvvrQKTQqRCcDa5aq31oSiT9M5WQ96BlIGKHRPWGpvm 0822V7M9RF2mYZPIfgKfTSvZpYHzjz+RM7PvBBiBc9l95vy70Sh7SywIF86H80Ag D0dUIDtGlrSANhXjx4EJiEYEGBECAAYFAjqcGaoACgkQnu53feEYxlHdVACgjVhU Y8CKf6MYZgQOR9eIDNvTX0AAn3dwbW1HLxEF5OQKJIsngl0BUlYK =d4S3 - -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7Uz4/nu53feEYxlERAiegAKDddAAwe1BhnEeoiPowia4/iJ85OgCfSwJ6 LAxjl6Y/NToHt8vg7F1+mp4= =6Xjc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: SBC and beowulf
- Next message: BLAST and other parallel sequence comparison programs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
