LAM and channel bonding doesn't work?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Trent Piepho xyzzy at speakeasy.orgFri Jul 13 15:15:07 PDT 2001
- Previous message: LAM and channel bonding doesn't work?
- Next message: NFS question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Martin Siegert wrote: > If there is somebody on the list who uses LAM and channel bonding: would > you be willing to verify or disprove this? - You probably have to change > the system size, I strongly suspect that the critical size is memory dependent: > my numbers (4000 and 8000) are for 512MB of RAM. Two dual CPU machines with 512MB RAM and two channel bonded fast ethernet interfaces. Software is kernel 2.2.17, glibc2.0, lam 6.5.1-usysv. [tap at venturi tap]$ mpirun -O n13,14 a.out -2 8000 id=0: MPI_Isend done. id=0: MPI_Irecv done. id=0: elapsed time: 12.901334 s id=1: MPI_Isend done. id=1: MPI_Irecv done. id=1: elapsed time: 13.191415 s Seems to work fine. Sending half of a 8000x8000 matrix of doubles in 15.65 seconds is about 18.9 MB/sec throughput in each direction. About what I get for a netperf TCP throughput test.
- Previous message: LAM and channel bonding doesn't work?
- Next message: NFS question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
