NFS question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Georgia Southern Beowulf Cluster Project gscluster at hotmail.comFri Jul 13 07:13:01 PDT 2001
- Previous message: LAM and channel bonding doesn't work?
- Next message: [Re: NFS question]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris, I've attempted the same thing before, but it simply does not work in any cases that I've tested. I does make since however, because (using your terminology) HEAD is mounting X:/vol as /mnt/v1. HEAD:/mnt/v1 is really just a blank directory if you think about it, that HEAD maps as coming from X:/vol. Now, if HEAD exports /mnt/v1 to NODE1, then it is really exporting a blank directory (i.e. i maps X:/vol when it personally reads/writes to it, but it has no facility to forward this directory to NODE1, giving it a blank directory instead). This may not be entirely correct, but it is an explanation I've found useful in thinking about such situations. If NODE1 absolutely needs to see X:/vol, then you can use the ip forwarding/ ip masquerading/ nat facilities in Linux (or your choice of OS) so that NODE1 knows about X and can see X:/vol itself. Thanks, Wes Wells _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Previous message: LAM and channel bonding doesn't work?
- Next message: [Re: NFS question]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
