Channel-bonding - choice of switch?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jakob Østergaard jakob at unthought.netThu Jul 12 06:37:36 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Channel-bonding - choice of switch?
- Next message: Channel-bonding - choice of switch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:02:45PM -0500, Mike Weller wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently trying to channel-bond our 5-node test cluster (running > Scyld). Since we already had an HP 4000m ProCurve switch, > (http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/switches/switch4000/specs.htm ), > I decided to use that. It does support trunking and Fast > EtherChannel. You can buy separate switches, unmanaged dirt cheap ones. Trunking N nics per node, requires N switches. This works, is simple, and it's cheap. -- ................................................................ : jakob at unthought.net : And I see the elder races, : :.........................: putrid forms of man : : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, : : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. : :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
- Previous message: Channel-bonding - choice of switch?
- Next message: Channel-bonding - choice of switch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
