reliable network for cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Brian Beuning bbeuning at mindspring.comWed Jul 4 17:20:11 PDT 2001
- Previous message: quotes on a beowulf cluster
- Next message: reliable network for cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Many people on this list seem to be interested in the comptational power of clusters. If their network goes down, they might just restart the problem they are crunching on. For some of us, the beauty of clusters is their reliability. If one node fails, the rest of the nodes can continue processing. Of course, a cluster is only as reliable as the network that connects the nodes. Channel Bonding seems great for getting more bandwidth but only helps with half of the network reliability issue. (It lets a node send packets out in a broken network, but does not necessarily let clients get to the box using Channel Bonding.) What I would like is a way to have multiple NIC cards in a node have the same IP address, each NIC is connected to a different switch/hub and have the routing figure out which paths are up and down. It should also do load balancing (aka scale the network). Since our clusters all use commodity hardware, paying for some esoteric network routers is not part of the plan. How do you folks solve this issue? Thanks, Brian Beuning
- Previous message: quotes on a beowulf cluster
- Next message: reliable network for cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
