QNX
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Juha Kumpulainen kumi at sci.fiWed Feb 28 10:52:50 PST 2001
- Previous message: QNX
- Next message: diskless Scyld or OSCAR beowulf setup?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Alan Grimes wrote: > I've recieved some intel that indicates that not only is the QNX > operating system vastly superior to linux in almost every way, it also > directly supports computational clusters! =) > We spend lots of time and money in order to get qnx in our production system. In theory qnx have very nice architecture. Obviously it is good system if you can live with its limitations. My experience was that combination of disk I/O, IP networking and anything more than average cpu load easily killed qnx. We then "ported" our code to linux (about 400,000 lines of c), that was end of the problems. qnx version was 4.x and linux 2.0.36. Regards, Juha Kumpulainen
- Previous message: QNX
- Next message: diskless Scyld or OSCAR beowulf setup?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list