QNX
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
rweidman at watson.chemical.missouri.edu rweidman at watson.chemical.missouri.eduWed Feb 28 07:35:54 PST 2001
- Previous message: QNX
- Next message: QNX
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am I missing something in this thread or is cost not a consideration? Randy On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, alvin wrote: > Alan Grimes wrote: > > > > I've recieved some intel that indicates that not only is the QNX > > operating system vastly superior to linux in almost every way, it also > > directly supports computational clusters! =) > > unless QNX has managed to get a large ammount of investment they will > have at most 5-10 real core OS developers. Linux has hundreds and most > of them are highly modivated. > > Granted it has been a few years since I have used QNX but my feeling at > the time was that it was a marginaly useable real-time OS with few tools > and no external applications. I still believe that QNX has a serious > realtime focus. Most applications for clusters are not realtime > applications. > > But I could be wrong. > > -- > Alvin Starr || voice: (416)585-9971 > Interlink Connectivity || fax: (416)585-9974 > alvin at iplink.net || > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: QNX
- Next message: QNX
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
