3Com o Cisco Switch: What is the best choice ?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu bogdan.costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.deThu Feb 22 05:28:18 PST 2001
- Previous message: (Fwd) Re: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Next message: Scyld and PVM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Andrés Felipe CALDERÓN wrote: > or, 12 switches 3Com SuperStack® 3 Switch 3300 XM (24 Ports) , our > provider said that the switches can be stacked together using a matrix > cable for two units (what does "stack using a matrix cable" mean?) Actually, IIRC up to 4 units can be stacked with the matrix cable(s). But you have to take into consideration that the matrix port has a limited bandwidth (1 Gb, IIRC) compared with the backplane one (2.4 Gb), so if you plan to use the 2 connected switches as a single one, you have a bottleneck. If you can configure your cluster or convince your users to never run jobs that use nodes connected on both sides of the matrix connection, you shouldn't have any problems. I'm using in a cluster 2 24 ports switches 2-ways channel-bonded, the inter-switch communication being only NFS and rsh/ssh (no MPI) and I'm very pleased with this setup. Sincerely, Bogdan Costescu IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu at IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De
- Previous message: (Fwd) Re: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Next message: Scyld and PVM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
