The FNN (Flat Neighborhood Network) paradox
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Horatio B. Bogbindero wyy at cersa.admu.edu.phThu Feb 22 05:35:10 PST 2001
- Previous message: The FNN (Flat Neighborhood Network) paradox
- Next message: (Fwd) Re: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > P.S. - Anyone care to try and make a version of PVM or MPICH that does > not assume all nodes have just one universally accessible IP address each? > We looked into it, and it seemed to be a bear in there... I ran away :) > I was able to hack LAM MPI over a weekend to get it to work, so PVM and > MPICH are not even on a back-burner for us right now... > -- wonderful. were you able to give feedback to jeff and the gang as ND about this? would they release it as a "feature" of LAM-MPI in the near future. right now, with the modified BNN arch, we have to contend with advanced routing issues. not quite ironned out yet but possible. btw, i really admire your work on FNN and the bunyip people. we derived much of our direction from your work. great work guys! -------------------------------------- William Emmanuel S. Yu Ateneo Cervini-Eliazo Networks (ACENT) email : william.s.yu at ieee.org web : http://cersa.admu.edu.ph/ phone : 63(2)4266001-5925/5904 My interest is in the future because I am going to spend the rest of my life there.
- Previous message: The FNN (Flat Neighborhood Network) paradox
- Next message: (Fwd) Re: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
